Cognitive style is the manner in which a person perceives the world and chooses to absorb knowledge or information he or she interacts with. It is a natural characteristic that is influenced by personality, brain health and genetics, among other factors. By understanding Styles of Cognition an instructor or teacher can turn everyone in the class into a winner. Most of the concepts will be easier to understand leading to better performances in tests and life.
The society judges children by their academic performance. Unfortunately, as years go by, some of the brightest in class are overtaken in other fields. It becomes a battle or memorizing against practical work, concentration against experimenting as well as quick action against reasoning through an idea. The results are evidently different with time, but they only prove that every child is a genius of a kind.
The fact that there are different cognitive styles is testament that the ability of each kid is intact. It raises the question of class organization and whether it is possible to accommodate the uniqueness of each individual. If content was delivered in a different manner, maybe, the best in each child can be brought out.
There is an opposite for each cognitive style that exists. Reflective and impulsive learners are on opposite sides. When an impulsive learner engages with information, he or she acts on it very quickly. The learners have no room for deep insight. For the reflective learner, he ponders over this information and is very keen on details. In class, there are students who are better at answering questions while others love research and background work.
Low and high conceptual learners are the other opposites. The low conceptual is highly dependent on rules and has trouble generating own ideas. The high conceptual will device own strategies and rules and always has an alternative when solving problems. Students who have been marked to fall in the low conceptual category have been identified to have challenges learning.
Simultaneous and successive learners are the other categories. Successive learners get answers by following laid rules and digging deep into ideas. This is a time consuming engagement. For a learner who is simultaneous, decisions are made at the blink of the moment. Simultaneous thinkers consider ideas in relation to each other. One is likely to conclude that one set of lines is shorter than the other without considering that the fact that the distance between them has been increased or reduced.
The learning styles should inform a tutor or instructor on the method to use. It is impossible for you to accommodate all students at a go. The best option is to combine different methods of delivery. Before you demonstrate how an engine works, for example, explain its operation in detail. The student who does not understand through the explanation will understand when it is demonstrated.
There is an explanation while some students excel in theoretical work while others do better in practical tasks. It is easier when an operation is demonstrated for some like in a physics practical class. However, theories of history and philosophy are more interesting for others. As an instructor, your role is to find a balance.
The society judges children by their academic performance. Unfortunately, as years go by, some of the brightest in class are overtaken in other fields. It becomes a battle or memorizing against practical work, concentration against experimenting as well as quick action against reasoning through an idea. The results are evidently different with time, but they only prove that every child is a genius of a kind.
The fact that there are different cognitive styles is testament that the ability of each kid is intact. It raises the question of class organization and whether it is possible to accommodate the uniqueness of each individual. If content was delivered in a different manner, maybe, the best in each child can be brought out.
There is an opposite for each cognitive style that exists. Reflective and impulsive learners are on opposite sides. When an impulsive learner engages with information, he or she acts on it very quickly. The learners have no room for deep insight. For the reflective learner, he ponders over this information and is very keen on details. In class, there are students who are better at answering questions while others love research and background work.
Low and high conceptual learners are the other opposites. The low conceptual is highly dependent on rules and has trouble generating own ideas. The high conceptual will device own strategies and rules and always has an alternative when solving problems. Students who have been marked to fall in the low conceptual category have been identified to have challenges learning.
Simultaneous and successive learners are the other categories. Successive learners get answers by following laid rules and digging deep into ideas. This is a time consuming engagement. For a learner who is simultaneous, decisions are made at the blink of the moment. Simultaneous thinkers consider ideas in relation to each other. One is likely to conclude that one set of lines is shorter than the other without considering that the fact that the distance between them has been increased or reduced.
The learning styles should inform a tutor or instructor on the method to use. It is impossible for you to accommodate all students at a go. The best option is to combine different methods of delivery. Before you demonstrate how an engine works, for example, explain its operation in detail. The student who does not understand through the explanation will understand when it is demonstrated.
There is an explanation while some students excel in theoretical work while others do better in practical tasks. It is easier when an operation is demonstrated for some like in a physics practical class. However, theories of history and philosophy are more interesting for others. As an instructor, your role is to find a balance.
About the Author:
Get more information about the different styles of cognition, today. You can also get details about the reasons why you should complete the InQ questionnaire at http://www.yourthinkingprofile.com/what-is-inq today.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire